{"id":863,"date":"2026-05-29T07:56:39","date_gmt":"2026-05-29T07:56:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rock-crusher-tractor.com\/?p=863"},"modified":"2026-05-29T07:58:41","modified_gmt":"2026-05-29T07:58:41","slug":"forest-land-conversion-agriculture-korea-thor-flm-guide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rock-crusher-tractor.com\/ko\/forest-land-conversion-agriculture-korea-thor-flm-guide\/","title":{"rendered":"\uc0b0\ub9bc\uc9c0\ub97c \uace0\uc6d0 \ub18d\uc7a5\uc73c\ub85c \uc804\ud658\ud558\ub294 \ubc29\ubc95 \u2014 THOR FLM \uc804\ud658 \uac00\uc774\ub4dc"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\ud1a0\ub974 \ud544\ub984<\/span>
\nNEW LAND DEVELOPMENT<\/span><\/div>\n

\uc0b0\ub9bc\uc9c0\ub97c \uace0\uc6d0 \ub18d\uc7a5\uc73c\ub85c \uc804\ud658\ud558\ub294 \ubc29\ubc95 \u2014 THOR FLM \uc804\ud658 \uac00\uc774\ub4dc<\/h1>\n

Korea has millions of hectares of marginal forest land adjacent to established highland farms. Converting it to productive agricultural land requires a machine that handles both stumps and embedded granite simultaneously \u2014 and a CVT tractor that standard mechanical gearboxes cannot replace.<\/p>\n

Forest Land Conversion Consultation<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

Across Korean highland counties \u2014 particularly in Gangwon-do, northern Gyeonggi-do, and North Chungcheong-do \u2014 significant areas of marginal forest land lie adjacent to established highland farms. This land consists of scrub forest, abandoned orchards, and secondary woodland that has grown on former agricultural fields over the past 30\u201350 years. Converting it back to productive highland agricultural use is one of the most substantial farm development investments a Korean highland operator can make \u2014 and when done correctly, one of the most rewarding.<\/p>\n

The challenge that distinguishes forest land conversion<\/strong> from standard field stone clearing is the combination of obstacles: stumps and root systems that a standard stone crusher cannot process, embedded granite stones that a standard forestry mulcher does not fragment to agricultural standard, and a dense sub-surface root mat that neither machine alone addresses. The THOR FLM is the machine designed specifically for this dual-obstacle environment \u2014 and understanding its CVT tractor requirement, its workflow position, and the regulatory process that turns cleared forest into registered agricultural land is what this guide covers.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Why Forest Land Needs a Different Machine \u2014 Stumps Require Shear Force, Stones Require Impact<\/h2>\n

\"THOR<\/p>\n

The fundamental difference between standard field stone clearing and forest land conversion lies in the nature of the obstacles present. Standard highland fields contain embedded granite stones \u2014 hard, rigid objects that fragment efficiently under the THOR 2.4’s high-velocity impact mechanism. Forest land adds two additional obstacle types that the THOR 2.4’s rotor cannot efficiently process:<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Stumps and root balls<\/p>\n

Tree stumps, even from small-diameter scrub species, are anchored by a radial root system that resists the THOR 2.4’s downward impact fragmentation approach. The rotor’s teeth are designed to fragment granite, not to shear through fibrous wood. Attempting to clear significant stump density with the THOR 2.4 produces rapid tooth wear, rotor overloading, and incomplete stump removal. The root ball that remains after a failed THOR 2.4 attempt on stumps continues to block deep soil preparation for 3\u20135 years as it slowly decays.<\/p>\n

What processes it correctly:<\/strong> The THOR FLM’s forestry-rated tooth pattern and rotor geometry is designed to shear through wood fibres and root structures at the correct depth, reducing them to chips and fine fragments that decompose within 1\u20132 seasons after incorporation.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sub-surface root mat<\/p>\n

Forest soil below the stump layer contains a dense mat of lateral roots at 10\u201330 cm depth \u2014 often denser and more continuous than the stone layer in the same soil. A standard PSW-3200 tillage pass on forest land encounters this root mat and cannot create a uniform seed bed without first fragmenting and severing the root structure. Deep tillage through an intact root mat produces ridged, uneven soil that seeds cannot be planted into at consistent depth.<\/p>\n

What processes it correctly:<\/strong> The THOR FLM simultaneously fragments the root mat and the stone layer in a single pass, reducing both to manageable particle sizes that the PSW-3200 can subsequently incorporate into a uniform fine-tilth seed bed.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\uc560\ud50c\ub9ac\ucf00\uc774\uc158<\/th>\n\ud1a0\ub974 \ud544\ub984<\/th>\n\ud1a0\ub974 2.4<\/a><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Primary use<\/td>\nForestry \/ silviculture conversion<\/td>\nAgricultural field stone clearing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Stump clearing<\/td>\n\u2705 Designed for this<\/td>\n\u274c \uad8c\uc7a5\ud558\uc9c0 \uc54a\uc74c<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Root mat clearance<\/td>\n\u2705 Designed for this<\/td>\n\u274c Rotor not rated for fibrous load<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rock \/ stone clearing (\u226430 cm)<\/td>\n\u2705 Simultaneous with stumps<\/td>\n\u2705 Primary function<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\ud2b8\ub799\ud130 \uc694\uad6c \uc0ac\ud56d<\/td>\nCVT \uc758\ubb34\uc801<\/td>\n180 HP min., standard gearbox OK<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
PTO \uc18d\ub3c4<\/td>\n1,000 RPM<\/td>\n1,000 RPM<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Position in workflow<\/td>\nStep 2 (after timber removal) \u2014 first machine on new forest land<\/td>\nStep 3\u20134 (annual maintenance on cleared fields)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

The CVT Requirement \u2014 Why Standard Mechanical Gearbox Tractors Cannot Run the THOR FLM<\/h2>\n

The most important tractor qualification for the THOR FLM is not horsepower \u2014 it is the transmission type. The THOR FLM requires a tractor equipped with a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT), also called an Infinitely Variable Transmission (IVT) by some Korean manufacturers. This requirement is not a recommendation: a standard mechanical gearbox tractor cannot safely operate the THOR FLM on forest land conversion duty.<\/p>\n

\n

Why CVT Is Mandatory \u2014 The Stump Impact Load Problem<\/p>\n

\n
The problem:<\/span>
\nWhen the THOR FLM’s rotor encounters a dense hardwood root or stump, the instantaneous resistance can spike to 5\u201310\u00d7 the normal operating load within milliseconds. On a mechanical gearbox tractor, this spike transmits directly through the driveline \u2014 the PTO shaft, gearbox, and transmission all experience the full shock load simultaneously. On repeated stump impacts over a working day, this accelerated shock loading causes premature gearbox failure, PTO clutch damage, and in severe cases, transmission case cracking.<\/span><\/div>\n
What CVT provides:<\/span>
\nA CVT transmission uses a hydraulic or hydrostatic drive that inherently cushions impact loads \u2014 the hydraulic fluid compresses and absorbs the shock spike rather than transmitting it rigidly through the driveline. The CVT also allows the forward speed to adjust continuously in response to load changes: as rotor load increases on a dense stump, the CVT automatically reduces forward travel speed to maintain constant PTO torque rather than forcing the engine to absorb an overload spike.<\/span><\/div>\n
Korean market:<\/span>
\nCVT tractors are available from LS Mtron, TYM, and Kukje in the 150\u2013230 HP range. When a forest land conversion project is planned, the tractor purchase decision must specify CVT transmission explicitly \u2014 not all models in the 180+ HP range include CVT as standard, and some manufacturers offer it only on specific model variants. Korea Watanabe confirms CVT compatibility for specific tractor models during the pre-purchase consultation.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

The 5-Phase Conversion Workflow \u2014 From Standing Forest to First Crop<\/h2>\n

Converting Korean forest land to productive highland agriculture requires completing five phases in strict sequence. Each phase is a prerequisite for the next \u2014 skipping or partially completing any phase produces rework costs in later phases that typically exceed the cost of doing the skipped phase correctly at the time.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
1<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Phase 1 \u2014 Permit and Survey (3\u20136 months before clearance)<\/p>\n

Apply for the agricultural land conversion permit through the county office. Provide a land survey, intended crop plan, and drainage scheme. For land with registered forest status, the Korea Forest Service (KFS) de-registration application runs in parallel. This phase runs entirely on administrative timeline \u2014 clearance work cannot legally begin until the permit is issued. Start Phase 1 six months before the planned clearing season.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
2<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Phase 2 \u2014 Timber Removal (1\u20133 weeks depending on stand density)<\/p>\n

Commercial timber is sold or processed before any machine clearing begins. Trees with trunk diameter above 20\u201325 cm should be felled and removed by logging contractors \u2014 the THOR FLM is not designed for standing trunk removal and will not process logs efficiently. After logging, the remaining slash, branches, and small-diameter material can be left on the ground for the THOR FLM to fragment in Phase 3. Organising Phase 2 carefully minimises the fragmentation load in Phase 3 and maximises timber revenue that partially offsets the clearing cost.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
3<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Phase 3 \u2014 THOR FLM Stump, Root Mat, and Stone Clearing (1\u20133 weeks per hectare)<\/p>\n

The THOR FLM on a CVT tractor makes 2\u20133 passes over the cleared forest area: the first pass at 20\u201325 cm depth fragments slash, surface stumps, and the upper root mat and stone layer; the second pass at 30\u201335 cm targets the deeper root and stone zone. Operating speed on forest land is significantly slower than on agricultural fields \u2014 0.5\u20131.0 km\/h on dense stump ground is typical. After THOR FLM passes, the surface is fragmented wood chip material mixed with crushed stone \u2014 visually very different from THOR 2.4 agricultural clearing output.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
4<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Phase 4 \u2014 THOR 2.4 Agricultural Standard Clearing + CT-2100 Collection (4\u20138 weeks)<\/p>\n

After THOR FLM Phase 3 has removed the forest obstacles, the THOR 2.4 \uc554\uc11d \ubd84\uc1c4\uae30<\/a> makes the final pass to achieve the agricultural zero-tolerance stone standard. The THOR FLM fragments to forest-clearing standard; the THOR 2.4 brings the result to the sub-5 cm \/ 30 cm depth standard required for potato production, or the sub-1 cm \/ 40 cm standard required for ginseng. CT-2100 collection after the THOR 2.4 pass removes the stone material permanently. Phase 4 can typically be completed in October of the year after Phase 3, using the winter frost cycle to heave any residual sub-surface material before the spring soil preparation.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
5<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Phase 5 \u2014 Soil Preparation, Amendment, and First Crop (Year 2)<\/p>\n

Soil test (pH, OM, available nutrients) in November. Lime application + PSW-3200 incorporation in October\u2013November. Wait for the spring frost cycle to complete. PSW-3200 fine-tilth preparation in April. First crop seeding in late April\u2013early May. Year 1 (clearing year) is a zero-revenue year on the new land; Year 2 is the first production year. Year 2 typically delivers 60\u201375% of the yield achievable on a 3-year established cleared field \u2014 the soil OM and microbial community have not yet reached their full productivity, but the stone-free physical environment from Phase 4 allows full-depth machine cultivation and produces Grade 1 proportion well above any un-cleared alternative.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

The Land Registration Process \u2014 Converting Forest Classification to Agricultural Land<\/h2>\n

\"THOR<\/p>\n

Korean land registration classifies each parcel by its current use \u2014 forest land (imya), agricultural land (jeon, for dry crops), and rice paddy (dap). Converting forest classification to agricultural classification requires a formal administrative process that must be completed before the cleared land can be registered as eligible for Korean agricultural machinery subsidies and before it can receive GAP field registration. The key steps:<\/p>\n

\n
Land Registration Checklist \u2014 Forest to Agricultural Classification<\/div>\n
\n

\u2610<\/span><\/p>\n

KFS de-registration (imya to non-imya status).<\/strong> Submit a forest land use change application to the local Korea Forest Service district office, including the land survey, drainage plan, and intended agricultural use description. Processing time: 2\u20134 months. Required before any clearing begins legally on officially registered forest land.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

\u2610<\/span><\/p>\n

Agricultural land conversion permit (nong-ji jeon-yong heo-ga).<\/strong> Submit to the county agricultural land committee. Required documents: land survey, soil profile description, drainage plan, crop rotation plan, field layout plan. Processing time: 1\u20133 months after KFS de-registration. Typically issued with conditions (minimum field size, buffer zones, soil conservation measures).<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

\u2610<\/span><\/p>\n

County cadastral survey update.<\/strong> After clearing and soil preparation, commission a new cadastral survey to confirm field boundaries, drainage outlet points, and access road alignment. The updated cadastral record is the basis for the land classification update in the official land register (toji daejang).<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

\u2610<\/span><\/p>\n

MAFRA field registration (nong-ji won-bu registration).<\/strong> Register the newly converted agricultural land with the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. This registration is required for: eligibility for government machinery subsidies, GAP field registration, Nong-hyup cooperative membership benefits, and crop insurance coverage. Complete within 12 months of agricultural land classification issuance.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

\u2610<\/span><\/p>\n

Soil conservation completion report.<\/strong> For conversions above 5,000 m\u00b2 (0.5 ha), submit a soil conservation completion report to the county confirming that the drainage scheme, erosion control measures, and field boundary treatments specified in the permit conditions have been implemented. Required within 6 months of first crop establishment.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The complete registration process from KFS application to MAFRA field registration typically takes 12\u201318 months. Korea Watanabe advises customers starting the process to submit the KFS de-registration application in January of the year before the planned first clearing season \u2014 ensuring the permit is in place for October\u2013November clearing, December\u2013March winter settlement, and April first-crop year preparation.<\/p>\n


\n\"Korean<\/p>\n

The Investment Case \u2014 New Land Value vs Clearance Cost<\/h2>\n
\n

1 ha Forest Land Conversion \u2014 Representative Cost and Return Structure<\/p>\n

\n
Phase 1\u20132 (permit + timber):<\/span>
\nPermit fees 200,000\u2013500,000 KRW. Timber revenue from commercial timber: 500,000\u20132,000,000 KRW (offsets). Net: 0\u20131,500,000 KRW cost.<\/div>\n
Phase 3 (THOR FLM contractor):<\/span>
\nContractor rate: 2,000,000\u20134,000,000 KRW\/ha. THOR FLM is typically accessed through a Korea Watanabe affiliated contractor on a per-hectare basis rather than purchased for a single conversion project.<\/div>\n
Phase 4 (THOR 2.4 + CT-2100):<\/span>
\nOwn machine (if already purchased): fuel + wear parts ~500,000\u20131,000,000 KRW\/ha. Contractor rate: 1,000,000\u20132,000,000 KRW\/ha.<\/div>\n
Phase 5 (soil prep + Year 1 inputs):<\/span>
\nLime, compost, PSW-3200 passes: 1,500,000\u20132,500,000 KRW\/ha.<\/div>\n
Total clearance + preparation cost:<\/span>
\n~5,000,000\u201310,000,000 KRW\/ha (net of timber revenue offset)<\/span><\/div>\n
Year 2 first-crop revenue (potato):<\/span>
\n~15,000,000\u201322,000,000 KRW\/ha gross (cleared field, cooperative channel, Year 2 OM level)<\/span><\/div>\n
Payback period:<\/span>
\n6\u201318 months of full production (Years 2\u20133) after Year 1 clearing year<\/span><\/div>\n
Land asset value uplift:<\/span>
\nRegistered agricultural land in Gangwon-do highland zones typically commands 3\u20135\u00d7 the land price of equivalent forest parcel \u2014 independently of the crop revenue return on clearance investment.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\uc790\uc8fc \ubb3b\ub294 \uc9c8\ubb38<\/h2>\n
\n
\nHow do I convert forest land to agriculture in Korea \u2014 what is the first step?<\/summary>\n

The first step is confirming the land’s current cadastral classification. Check the online Korea Land Information System (Gukto Jeongbo Peullaeom) to confirm whether the parcel is classified as imya (forest), jeon (dry cropland), or another category. If it is classified as imya, the KFS de-registration application is the mandatory first administrative step \u2014 no physical clearing can legally begin until this application is submitted and approved. Start the KFS application at least 6 months before the planned clearing season. While the KFS application is processing, Korea Watanabe can advise on the clearing specification, THOR FLM contractor availability, and the THOR 2.4 + CT-2100 Phase 4 configuration appropriate for the specific forest land type (density, stump size, stone density assessment).<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nCan the THOR 2.4 alone clear forest land without the THOR FLM \u2014 if the trees were already removed?<\/summary>\n

If commercial timber has been removed by a logging contractor and the remaining material consists only of slash (branches under 10 cm diameter), surface stumps under approximately 15 cm stump height, and the standard Korean highland stone population, then the THOR 2.4 can make useful progress on Phase 3\/4 combined clearing. However, even with timber removed, the root mat at 10\u201330 cm depth that remains from the original forest stand will still significantly impede the THOR 2.4’s rotor. The THOR 2.4 was not rated for repeated encounters with fibrous root mats \u2014 sustained operation through dense root material accelerates tooth wear, increases rotor imbalance risk, and can produce gearbox shock loads above the machine’s design limit. For forest conversion projects where the full THOR FLM Phase 3 is not available, Korea Watanabe recommends: (1) commissioning a THOR FLM contractor pass for Phase 3 even if the THOR 2.4 will handle Phase 4; (2) allowing 6\u201312 months for root mat decomposition after slash burning before beginning THOR 2.4 Phase 4 work. Never attempt to use the THOR 2.4 as a substitute for THOR FLM on active stump clearing \u2014 the warranty explicitly excludes damage from forestry operations on the agricultural stone crusher models.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nIs the marginal land clearing cost in Korea worth it compared to expanding by renting existing agricultural land?<\/summary>\n

The comparison between forest land conversion and rented agricultural land expansion involves several factors unique to each farm situation. Forest land conversion produces a permanent asset \u2014 the cleared, registered agricultural land has a capital value that rented land does not. The 5\u201310 million KRW\/ha conversion cost, spread over a 10-year holding period, is 500,000\u20131,000,000 KRW\/ha\/year of amortised cost \u2014 significantly less than the typical annual rental cost for premium Korean highland agricultural land in established farming areas (typically 1,500,000\u20133,000,000 KRW\/ha\/year in Gangwon-do highland zones). For farmers with access to adjacent forest parcels at reasonable acquisition cost, conversion is typically more economical than renting equivalent established land over a 5\u201310 year horizon, and builds permanent asset value. The calculation changes if the forest land acquisition cost is high \u2014 the conversion investment plus purchase price must still produce a positive return versus the rental alternative.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nWhat is the timeline from applying for the land conversion permit to the first crop on converted Korean forest land?<\/summary>\n

The representative timeline for a 1\u20135 ha Korean forest land conversion project beginning with the KFS de-registration application is as follows: Month 1: submit KFS application and begin MAFRA agricultural land conversion permit application simultaneously. Months 2\u20136: permit processing. Month 7: permits issued, timber removal contracted. Month 8: logging complete, Phase 3 THOR FLM clearing begins. Month 9: THOR FLM Phase 3 complete. Month 10 (October): Phase 4 THOR 2.4 + CT-2100 clearing + lime application. Months 11\u2013March: winter settlement, frost heave cycle. April (Year 2): Phase 5 \u2014 PSW-3200 fine tilth + soil amendment. May (Year 2): first crop seeding. August\u2013September (Year 2): first harvest. Total elapsed time from first permit application to first harvest: approximately 20\u201322 months. This timeline is the reason Korea Watanabe advises starting the process in January of Year 1 for a Year 2 first crop \u2014 the administrative process alone consumes 6 months before any physical clearing begins.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nIs the THOR FLM available for hire from Korea Watanabe for conversion projects?<\/summary>\n

Korea Watanabe maintains a network of affiliated THOR FLM operators who provide the Phase 3 forest conversion service on a per-hectare contractor basis. The THOR FLM is a specialised machine that most individual farms do not need to own \u2014 a single forest conversion project of 2\u201310 ha is typically completed in 2\u20134 weeks of THOR FLM operation, after which the machine is no longer needed for the farm’s regular operation. Korea Watanabe coordinates \uc11d\uc7ac \ubd84\uc1c4\uae30<\/a> and contractor availability, scheduling, and pricing for THOR FLM Phase 3 work as part of the complete forest conversion package consultation. The CT-2100 \uc554\uc11d \uc218\uc9d1\uae30<\/a>\u00a0is included in the Phase 4 planning. Contact Korea Watanabe with the land area, current forest stand description, and planned clearing timeline \u2014 Korea Watanabe will confirm THOR FLM contractor availability in the target window and provide a Phase 3 cost estimate for the specific project. The same consultation covers the THOR 3.0 \uc11d\uc7ac \ubd84\uc1c4\uae30<\/a> Phase 4 configuration for larger projects where coverage rate is the primary consideration.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Forest Land Conversion Planning \u2014 Start With the Permit<\/p>\n

Land parcel description + current classification + target crop \u2192 Korea Watanabe provides the 5-phase workflow schedule, THOR FLM contractor availability, Phase 4 THOR 2.4 configuration, permit application guidance and Year 2 first-crop projection.<\/p>\n

\n<\/div>\n

Plan My Conversion Project<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\ud3b8\uc9d1\uc790: Cxm<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

THOR FLM NEW LAND DEVELOPMENT Forest Land to Highland Farm \u2014 THOR FLM Conversion Guide Korea has millions of hectares of marginal forest land adjacent to established highland farms. Converting it to productive agricultural land requires a machine that handles both stumps and embedded granite simultaneously \u2014 and a CVT tractor that standard mechanical gearboxes […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-863","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-application-and-technical-guid"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rock-crusher-tractor.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/863","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rock-crusher-tractor.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rock-crusher-tractor.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rock-crusher-tractor.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rock-crusher-tractor.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=863"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/rock-crusher-tractor.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/863\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":867,"href":"https:\/\/rock-crusher-tractor.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/863\/revisions\/867"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rock-crusher-tractor.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=863"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rock-crusher-tractor.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=863"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rock-crusher-tractor.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=863"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}